Friday 3 March 2017

Humanistic Psychology

Carl Rogers
Carl Rogers

Humanistic Psychology: 

It is a branch of psychology whose primary concern is with the development of the self with the uniqueness of an individual. Sometimes, humanistic psychology is referred to as third-force psychology; the other two forces are behaviorism and Freudian theory.

Humanistic psychology has its roots in philosophy, especially in the existential philosophy of writers such as Jean-Paul Sartre. These philosophers wondered about the nature and purpose of humanity and of human existence (hence, the label existentialism). They were concerned about what it means to be human and how humanity grows and expresses itself in each individual.

Meanwhile, it is worth mentioning here that existentialism is a philosophical movement characterized by a preoccupation with existence. Existential philosophers often describe the human condition in terms such as abandonment, loneliness, despair, and alienation. These feelings are assumed to arise from our lack of certain knowledge about our origins and our eventual end. Hence, the label existentialism because the only knowable reality is existence.
Humanistic psychology is an orientation that readily admits that some people smile when they wallow in mud, some turn up their noses but endure the embarrassment, and others find such behavior quite unacceptable.

In more human terms, humanism is based on the fundamental observation that although we might resemble each other in many ways, each of us is quite different from each other. Our uniqueness is our “self”. And self is the most central concept in humanistic psychology.

The Humanistic Teacher:

The humanistic view emphasizes two things: the uniqueness of the pupil and the teacher’s attitudes towards students. Hence, humanistic teachers are especially sensitive to diversity in their classrooms.

If teaching is both an art and a science, humanists are on the side of art and behaviorists on the side of science. One should keep in mind that most educators do not fall into either the humanist, or the behaviorists, or the cognitive camp. Most are quite eclectic; they borrow from here and there.

Rogerian Humanistic Theory:

Carl Rogers was the first and foremost a psychotherapist. His main concern was with understanding human personality in order to understand how it be changed, how happiness might be restored to saddened lives. 

Rogers’ theory emerged primarily as a reaction against other highly popular approaches to therapy such as Freudian theory and behaviorism. Roger felt strongly that these approaches were far less respectful and humane than they should be.

There are different terms which are used to describe the various emphases of Rogerian theory. These are:

Client-centered therapy (also called “person-centered therapy”): 

It describes several aspects of the system. It indicates, first, that the theory is a therapeutic one; that is, it is designed to be useful to a counselor who deals with behavioral and emotional problems. Second, this label highlights the major difference between this and other approaches to counseling--namely, it indicates that the counseling procedures revolve around the individual. It proposes client-centered as opposed to directive therapy. The counselor’s role in client-centered therapy is accordingly de-emphasized; the therapist, instead of giving advice or solving problems for clients, sets the stage so that the clients themselves define their own problems, react to them, and take steps toward their solution.

Phenomenology

The term, commonly used in Rogerian theory, denotes concern with the world as it is perceived by an individual rather than as the world may actually be. Rogers notes that counselors and teachers can never truly know the individual’s private, phenomenological world. But to be truly effective, they must try to understand it. Accordingly, empathy is an important characteristic of any humanistic educator.

Humanism: 

It has historically been concerned with human worth, with individuality, with humanity, and with the individual’s right to determine personal actions. Accordingly, the development of human potential tends to be highly valued, while the attainment of material goals is de-emphasized. Thus, Rogers describers self-actualization as the end toward which all humans strive.


Hypothesis, Theory, Exploratory Method, Confirmatory Method

Key Terms

Hypothesis: 

It is a prediction or educated guess. It is a formal statement of the researcher’s prediction of the relationship that exists among the variables under the investigation.

Theory: 

It refers to an explanation that discusses how a phenomenon operates and why it operates as it does. Theory often refers to a generalization or set of generalizations that are used systematically to explain some phenomenon. In other words, a well-developed theory explains how something operates in general.
    Research: Exploratory Method
    Research: Exploratory Method

Exploratory method: 

It is a bottom-up (i.e., movement from data to patterns to theory) or theory-generation approach to research. It includes three steps—first, the researcher starts by making observations; second, the researcher studies the observations and searches for patterns (i.e., a statement of what is occurring); and third, the researcher makes a tentative conclusion or a generalization about the pattern or how some aspect of the world operates. This exploratory method is sometimes called the inductive method because it moves from the “particular to the general”.

Confirmatory method: 

It is a top-down (i.e., movement from theory to hypothesis to data) or theory-testing approach to research. It also includes three steps—first, the researcher states a hypothesis; second, the researcher collects data to be used to test the hypothesis empirically; and third, the researcher decides tentatively to accept or reject the hypothesis on the basis of the data. This confirmatory method is sometimes called the deductive method because it moves from the “general to the particular”.

Criterion of falsifiability: 

The criterion of falsifiability is the property of a statement or theory that it is capable of being refuted by experience. It also says that we should not selectively search for confirming evidence for our beliefs and explanations and then stop with that so-called evidence. Good researchers carefully search for and examine any negative evidence that operates against their beliefs, research conclusions, and theoretical explanations.

Rule of parsimony: 

It is another criterion for evaluating theories. A theory is parsimonious when it is simple, concise, and succinct. For example, if two competing theories explain and predict a phenomenon equally well, then the more parsimonious theory is to be preferred according to the rule of parsimony. In other words, simple theories are preferred over highly complex ones, other things being equal.

Replication: 

It refers to research examining the same variables with different people. Replication by other researchers should make you more confident about a research finding because the resulting evidence is much stronger.

Principle of evidence: 

It refers to the philosophical idea that empirical research provides evidence, not proof. Therefore, from now onwards, whenever you want to use the world proof, just use the word evidence. In research, slogan goes like this: “It is about evidence, not proof!” We call this idea the principle of evidence.


Note: Both methods—Exploratory as well as Confirmatory—use empirical data, but their purpose is different.

Programmed Instruction

Programmed Instruction

A program is a subject which pupils learn. As far as programmed instruction is concerned, it is a new strategy of teaching. It is a device or strategy to control student’s behavior and helps them learn without the supervision of a teacher. It is highly individualized instructional strategy for modification of behavior.

The programmed instruction is the arrangement of materials which are to be learnt by the pupils in graded steps of difficulty; it is in such a manner and sequence that it will result in the most efficient rate of understanding and retention. It is a method of giving individualized instructions in which the student is active and proceeds at his/her own pace. Physical presence of teacher is not essential in this strategy.

According to Smith and Moore (1962), “Programmed instruction is a process of arranging the material to be learned into a series of sequential steps, usually it moves from a familiar background into complex and set of concepts, principles and understanding.”

Thus, it can be concluded that the programmed instruction is an auto-instructional technique. The information is provided in small steps and each learner progresses at his/her own pace.

Origin of Programmed Instruction:


  1. The origin of modern programmed instruction is from the psychology of learning and not from technology.
  2. It is an application of operant conditioning learning theory to teaching-learning situations.
  3. It has got a historical momentum, after the publication of “The science of learning and art of teaching” article by B.F. Skinner. In this article, Skinner listed the problems of education system. He also discussed the potential of instructional programs to provide more feedback.

Characteristics of Programmed Instructions:

As far as characteristics of programmed instructions, these are as follows:
  • It is not an audio visual device. It is a part of education technology, i.e. instructional technology.
  • It is a method of giving or receiving individualized instructions. It keeps in view their individual differences. The learner moves at his/her own speed.
  • It clearly defines the entering and terminal behavior of the learners.
  • It is not the solution of educational problems. It is a new instructional strategy for the modification of behavior of learner.
  • It is systematic and sequenced.
  • It cannot replace the teacher
  • It provides immediate feedback to the learners.

Objectives of Programmed Instruction:

The objectives of programmed instruction have been summarized as follows:
  • To help the student in learning by doing.
  • To provide the learners situation so that they can learn at their own pace.
  • To help students learn in the absence of a teacher.
  • To present the content in a controlled manner and in logically related steps.
  • To help students in assessing their own performance themselves by comparing it with the given answers.

Assumptions Regarding Programmed Instruction:


The programmed instruction has the following basic assumptions:
  • The student has learnt micro teaching procedure.
  • The student learns better if the content matter is presented in small steps.
  • The student learns better if he/she is motivated to learn by confirming the responses.
  • The student learns better if he/she commits minimum errors in learning.
  • The student learns better if the sequence of content is psychological workable.
  • The learning may be effective if the pre-requisites are specified on part of the learner.

Principles of Programmed Instruction:


Principles of Programmed Instruction

A good programmed instruction is based upon the principles of learning. These principles are based on psychological theories. There are five fundamental principles of programmed instruction. These are the following.

Principle of Small Steps:  

A program is prepared with large number of small and easy steps. The subject matter is broken down into a sequence of small step. A learner can take a step at a time. He/she has to read a small step by being active. Learning is better when the material is presented in small steps. It also reduces the rate of committing errors and encourages further learning.

Principle of Active Responding: 

Programmed instruction provides the information in the form of small steps and each step is required to be responded by the learner. Hence, the learner should be actively involved in the learning material. The learner does not remain passive because there is a need of active involvement in learning. The learner has to construct the response. It is an integral part of learning. The frames of program should also be designed logically that the learner shows interest in responding the frames.

Principle of Immediate Reinforcement: 

Programmed instruction involves giving immediate reinforcement to the learners. When learners response to the frames, they do not know that these responses are correct or wrong. By providing immediate reinforcement or confirmation to the response, the learner gets confidence. When the learner is reinforced for a correct response, he/she becomes repetitive for further learning. The learner learns best if his/her response is confirmed immediately. The confirmation provides reinforcement to the learner.

Principle of Self-Pacing: 

Programmed instruction rests on the principle of self-pacing. It recognizes the individual differences of the learners. This principle is based on the assumption that each learner can work each step as slowly or as quickly, depending upon his/her pace. Each learner is free to move according to his/her own speed, slowly or quickly as they like. Some can learn things at a quicker speed and may skip one or more frames, whereas others can go on slowly. It satisfies every learner’s need.

Principles of Continuous Evaluation:

The programmed instruction is based on continuous evaluation by recording the response of the learner. The learner leaves the record of his/her study for each step in response sheet. It helps to improve the quality of programmed material through checking the number of errors at each step. Also, the learner’s progress can be evaluated by looking into the various types of response produced by the learner.

Learning


The moment we listen the word “learning”, many of us start thinking of studying and school. But the reality is that learning is not limited to school. We learn everyday of our lives. Babies learn to kick their legs, teenagers learn cycling or lyrics of their favorite song, middle-aged people learn to change their diet patters.

In the light of all these examples, it can be inferred that learning occurs when experience causes a relatively permanent change in an individual’s knowledge and behavior. Learning is a change that takes place through practice or experience, changes due to growth or maturation.

It is worth mentioning here that the change might be deliberate or unintentional; but the change must be relatively permanent; it must be for a long time.

In other words, learning is the acquisition of habits, knowledge and attitudes. It involves new ways of doing things. When learning occurs, a more or less permanent change is experienced in the learner’s behavior.

Learning is an active process that needs to be stimulated and guided towards desirable outcomes. External stimuli that induce learning include, particularly the influence of the teacher through the assignments he/she makes, the questions he/she asks, the visual aids and other procedures that he/she utilizes to arouse learning interest and activity.

Definitions of Learning:

The following definitions have been given from different perspectives. These are:

1. Learning is a Change in Behavior:
According to J.P. Guilford, “Learning is any change in behavior, resulting from behavior”. In this definition, a distinction between change in behavior due to maturity and change in behavior due to learning is not clear; though both these activities take place simultaneously.

2. Learning is an Organization of Behavior:
According to Garrett, “Learning is that activity by virtue of which we organize our response with new habits.” In the light of this definition, it is evident that the element of organization in learning is very much important. For example, in learning to ride a cycle, we have to organize the activities of turning the pedal, balancing the handle, etc. in order to be reasonably safe with the vehicle. Learning of the activity of cycling will be complete, only when he/she accomplishes this organization.

3. Learning is the Reinforcement of the New Activity:
Learning of a new activity is an addition to the person’s store of experience. Reinforcement too is an vital element in the act of learning; it helps in forming only successful responses and weeding out the unsuccessful one. According to R. S. Woodworth, “An activity may be called learning in so far as it develops the individual in any way, good or bad and makes his environment and experiences different from what it would otherwise have been.”

Characteristics of Learning:
  • Learning is growth
  • Learning is purposeful
  • Learning is intelligent
  • Learning is both individual and social
  • Learning affects the conduct of the learner
  • Learning is adjustment
  • Learning is experience
  • Learning is active
Methods of Learning:
The principal forms or methods of learning are learning through imitation, learning through conditioned response, learning through trial and error, and learning through insight.

Learning through Imitation:

Learning through imitation is one of the most important forms of learning. It is generally observed that children imitate the behavior, habits, manners and ways of adults. In imitation, the learning exactly copies the behavior of anther person without understanding or thinking.

The main characteristics of learning through imitation are the following:
·         The imitator never does it before imitation, but performs the activity only after seeing it
·         In imitation, learner exactly copies the activity performed before him/her (learner)

Learning through Conditioned Response:

It is one of the most important methods of learning, especially for children. In childhood, many of the responses of the child are conditioned to particular objects and even when the individual becomes an adult, his conditioned response continues.

Learning through Trial and Error:

The method of trial and error is used in the following circumstances:
  • This method is used when the learner is completely motivated and can see the goal clearly. Motivation as well as the presence of the goal is necessary for awakening the response in learning through trial and error.
  • The method of trial and error is used when the learner fails to find the solution of the problem. It is only when he/she fails to find out the solution of the problem that he/she proceeds blindly, tries in various directions, commits errors, eliminates them, and finally arrives at a successful response
  • The method of trial and error is used when perception alone or learned activities are not sufficient.
Learning through Insight:

The insight method of learning is superior to the methods of imitation and conditioned response, because both the latter methods (imitation and conditioned response) take more time.

Students will be permanently helped by the use of insight method of learning in place of trial and error methods in their studies and other activities.

There are many characteristics of learning through insight. These are as follows:
Insight is sudden
  • Insight alters perception
  • Old objects appear in new patterns and organization by virtue of insight
  • Insight is relative to the intellectual level
  • Previous experiences and maturity also effects insight
Maturation and Learning:

The learner’s stage of maturity is important in the learning process. Until and unless, there is sufficient physiological maturity, there will be little learning.

For example, the child learns to walk only after he has reached a particular stage. He learns to read more easily only after he has reached his individual state of readiness for reading.

Rate of maturation varies from individual to individual. Automatic activity, random acts, reflexes and instincts and sudden expressions of emotions can be accepted as unlearned actions and the result of maturation.

Factors of Learning:
There are various factors that assist the process of learning among human beings. These factors can be divided into the following categories:

Psychological Factors:

These are the most important factors in the process of learning. It includes the following factors:
  • Generalization: When an individual goes through many similar and comparable experiences, he/she discerns the common element among them. On this basis, he/she formulates a general rule that has considerable influence on his/her future conduct.
  • Facilitation: It is an important factor in learning because it is human tendency to learn activities that are simple and interesting.
  • Differentiation: An individual distinguishes between dissimilar objects or compares them in such a manner to bring dissimilarity.
  • Inhibition: It is an obstructive psychological element or factor in learning. In this, some psychological elements provide obstruction in the learning process.
  • Integration: It helps to improve one’s insight into the subjects already learnt.
Physiological Factors:

Learning is more a psycho-physiological process than a purely psychological one. Following are the important physiological factors in learning:

·     Fatigue: In a state of fatigue, the individual’s capacity to learn is considerably reduced and all that is learnt is also easily forgotten.
·      Drugs and intoxicants: These are the obstacles in the process of learning.
·     Diseases: Disease, whether it is physical or mental, obstructs learning as it reduces the capacity to grasp and learn.
·   Excited Physical Condition: An excited bodily state, arising out of emotion cause difficulty in learning.
·   Difference in Age and Maturity: Before any particular activity can be acquired, it is necessary to attain a particular level of maturity that can only come at a particular age level.

Physical Factors:

The physical factors have also some importance in the learning process. For example, high and low temperature, noise, and amount of humidity, all these conditions influence the process of learning.

Social Factors:

Man is a social animal and all his activities are influenced by the social conditions, for example, imitation, suggestion, sympathy, praise, competition, and cooperation. All these factors influence the learning process.

Wednesday 1 March 2017

Gestalt Psychology

Gestalt Psychology
Gestalt Psychology
The word “Gestalt” is a Gernman word which means form or configuration. Sometimes, the Gestalt psychology is called configuration psychology. The Gestalt School developed in Germany around the year 1912 under the guidance of Max Wertheimer, Kurt Koffka, and Wolfgang Kohler.

This school (Gestalt school) had its inception as a result of Wertheimer’s interest in the phi-phenomenon, an illusion of movement. Wertheimer was interested in the perception of movement and he conducted a large number of experiments on “phi-phenomenon”.

In one such experiment, Wertheimer exposed a vertical line followed by a horizontal line with a very short interval of time (say, fraction of a second). The subjects should have perceived them as two different lines exposed one after the other. But they perceived only one line.

The Gestalt School of psychology developed as a revolt against the structuralism and associationism. But when it gained momentum, it also protested against Watson’s Behaviorism. It must be noted here that both behaviorism and Gestalt psychology developed about the same time in two different countries, but neither party had any knowledge of the other’s development.

Silent features:

Behaviorism abandoned the study of conscious experiences. It confined itself to the study of overt behavior only. But Gestalt psychology proposed to continue the study of experiences. According to its founders, excellent psychological data can be obtained from direct experiences. Experience is an important object of study in psychology. Thus, Gestalt psychology aimed at studying both overt behavior and experiences.

Behaviorism opposed the analysis of the structure of conscious into its component elements. It emphasized the association of stimulus and response in behavior. It reduced behavior to S-R (Stimulus-Response) units. Gestalt psychology was opposed to analysis altogether. It was opposed to reductionism. According to Gestalt school of psychology, every experience carries with it a quality of wholeness. The whole dominates over its parts.

Behaviorism rejected introspection as a method of investigation. But Gestalt psychologists did not reject introspection altogether. They favored phenomenological introspection.

Behaviorism rejects sensation because of methodological difficulties in studying sensory process. Gestalt psychology rejected sensation because sensations are atoms or elements of experiences.

Behaviorists ignored the study of perception. But the study of perception was the very heart of Gestalt psychology. Perhaps, no other school of psychology contributed so much to the study of perception as the Gestalt school.

The analysis of behavior by behaviorists is a molecular one. But the explanation of behavior by Gestalt psychology is a molar one. It must be mentioned here that molecular behavior occurs in the organism in a given geographical environment. But according to Gestalt psychologists, behavior occurs in a given geographical environment which is regulated by behavioral environment. They, therefore, differentiated between geographical environment and the behavioral environment. The environment as it exists in reality is the geographical environment. But the environment as perceived by the individual is the behavior environment.

Watson’s behaviorism reduced thinking to laryngeal habits. Watson identified thought with implicit speech movements. He interpreted thinking in the light of peripheral theory and psychological orientation. But Gestalt psychology discarded Watson’s explanation of the thought process. Gestalt psychologists presented a psychological approach to the study of the thought process. Gestalt psychologists were opposed to the association theory of thinking or piecemeal thinking. They insisted on the fact that when confronted with a problem, the individual must understand the essential structure of the whole situation and make an appropriate response. The individual must be able to organize or reorganize the materials so as to produce some results. These psychologists favor productive thinking.


Perception:

For structuralists and functionalists like Wundt and Titchner, perception was a crucial problem. Watson ignored perception. But the Gestalt psychologists want to make the study of the perceptual process the very heart of their system.

There is a general agreement among contemporary psychologists that the Gestalt school exerted a greater influence of the evolution of modern perceptual psychology that any other group. 


Gestalt psychology is “form” psychology. According to its proponents, our perceptual experiences arise as Gestalten or molar configurations which are not mere aggregations of sensations but organized and meaningful whole. 

Gestalt psychologists apply the total approach as opposed to the part approach and say that individual perceives objects as “whole” and not part by part. The whole approach provides meaningful perception because the whole is greater than the sum of its parts. For example, when we perceive a table, we perceive it as a molar object, not a collection of color patches, four legs, nuts, bolts and the like. 

After innumerable experiments on perception, these psychologists were able to formulate certain laws which govern the organization of perception. These laws are the following:

·         The law of proximity
·         The law of similarity
·         The law of closure
·         The law of good figure
·         The law of continuation
·         The principle of figure and ground


However, the Gestalt school’s challenge in the area of perception was so successful that the Gestalt principles are now widely recognized as fundamental.

School of Psychoanalysis

Sigmund Freud
Sigmund Freud

What is psychoanalysis?

The development of psychoanalysis has its origin in the medical practice of Sigmund Freud in Vienna around 1900.

Freud, who is considered as the founder of psychoanalysis, was an Austrian neurologist. He was born to Galician Jewish parents on 6th May 1856. In the year 1938, Freud left his native country (Austria) in order to escape his life from the Nazis. The very next year (that is 1939), he died in exile in the United Kingdom on 23rd September 1939.

Freud was a practicing physician who specialized in diseases of the nervous system. He found that many of his patients with nervous disease were indeed suffering from mental conflicts and neurotic states. These mental conflicts and neurotic states manifested themselves as physical disorders such as extreme fatigue, nervousness, insomnia, and so on.
In such a situation, treating the patients’ physical symptoms failed to get at the root of the problem. Clearly, what the patients needed was psycho-therapy rather than physical therapy.

While Freud was puzzling over these difficulties, Jean-Martin Charcot, a French practitioner, and Joseph Bewer, a German practitioner had been experiencing considerable success with the “hypnotic treatment” of hysteria. Freud was in touch with these results.

Sigmund Freud tried out hypnotic treatment on his patients. Soon, he noticed that all patients could not be hypnotized. Moreover, hypnosis resulted only in a temporary alleviation of symptoms, not in permanent cure.  

Freud observed that the real value of this treatment lay in a deeper and more complicated analysis of the patients. Thus, he changed over to a new technique called the “free association technique”.

Psychoanalysis

Free Association Technique:

In “free association technique”, the patient relaxes on a couch and freely tells whatever comes into his mind. The psychoanalyst listens to the patient and observes his emotional reaction, signs of distress, resistance to the treatment and so on.

Following this session, the therapist discusses with the patient interpretation of the facts which had been brought to light during the analytical period.

Dream Analysis:

During the course of his practice, Freud became convinced that dreams were of special significance for the new therapy. The analysis of the dream revealed to him the hidden wishes, lost memories, and emotional attitude of the patient.

Dream analysis, or the analysis of a patient’s dream, also revealed repressed unconscious desires which were very important for the treatment of neurotic disorders. Freud considered dream interpretation as an important part of the theory and practice of psychoanalysis. He considered dream as a royal road to the interpretation of unconscious.

After the analysis, dreams reveal two distinct types of contents—the manifest content and the latent content.

The dream as remembered by the dreamer upon awakening is the manifest content. But the real or the hidden facts in the dream are the latent contents of the dream.

The latent content may be quite different from the manifest content, because the former gets distorted and undergoes considerable modification by a certain process known as “dream work”.

Dream work operates through three ways: condensation, displacement, and secondary elaboration.

Condensation: In condensation, some elements of the dream are omitted altogether and others appear only in a fragmentary form. Sometimes, several elements may be blended into one. Generally unpleasant, unacceptable and harmful events in the dream are condensed.

Displacement: Most often, some elements of the dream may be replaced or displaced by other elements which are acceptable to the dreamer. Sometimes, the latent content of the dream takes an opposite direction. For example, clothing often represents nakedness; love may be a disguise for hate. This process is known as displacement.

Secondary elaboration: It is a process of hiding the real significance of the dream. Through this process, the dreamer, upon awakening, makes a good story out of the dream. He, therefore, adds new elements that were not in the original dream.

Dream analysis is designed to reverse these various processes and to reveal precisely what is repressed or hidden. This is done in two ways: First, the dreamer is required to associate around the various elements of the dream. Second, the dreams generally appear symbolically. Thus, an analysis of the various symbols in the dream reveals the real object of the dream.